Freezing of Gait Questionnaire: validity and reliability of the Swedish version
Identifieur interne : 000A84 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000A83; suivant : 000A85Freezing of Gait Questionnaire: validity and reliability of the Swedish version
Auteurs : M. H. Nilsson [Suède] ; P. Hagell [Suède]Source :
- Acta Neurologica Scandinavica [ 0001-6314 ] ; 2009-11.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Background – Patient‐reported assessments of freezing of gait (FOG) in Parkinson’s disease (PD), such as the FOG questionnaire (FOGQ), are needed because FOG is difficult to assess objectively. However, the measurement properties of the FOGQ have been sparsely assessed. Aim – To assess the measurement properties of the Swedish FOGQ, and to explore relationships between FOGQ scores and other aspects of PD. Methods – Thirty‐seven people with PD were assessed with the FOGQ, Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS), Hoehn and Yahr (HY), Falls‐Efficacy Scale [FES(S)], timed gait tests, and the SF‐36 physical functioning (PF) scale. Results – Mean (SD) FOGQ item scores ranged between 1.3 and 2.1 (1.2–1.5); corrected item–total correlations ranged between 0.80 and 0.94. Reliability was 0.95. Mean (SD) and median (q1–q3) FOGQ scores were 9.6 (7.4) and 10 (2–15). Floor and ceiling effects were ≤5.4%. FOGQ correlated strongest with UPDRS part II (ADL), UPDRS item 14 (freezing), and HY (rS 0.65–0.66). FOGQ scores correlated with PD duration, the Timed Up and Go test, dyskinesia, motor fluctuations, FES(S), and PF scores (rS 0.40–0.62). Fallers had higher FOGQ scores than non‐fallers (median 12.5 vs 5.0). Conclusion – Data support the measurement properties of the Swedish FOGQ by replicating and extending previous psychometric reports.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2009.01175.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Freezing of Gait Questionnaire: validity and reliability of the Swedish version</title><author><name sortKey="Nilsson, M H" sort="Nilsson, M H" uniqKey="Nilsson M" first="M. H." last="Nilsson">M. H. Nilsson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hagell, P" sort="Hagell, P" uniqKey="Hagell P" first="P." last="Hagell">P. Hagell</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:7228BDDB6D2D35017F1436A55E56C9B53411822F</idno><date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0404.2009.01175.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/7228BDDB6D2D35017F1436A55E56C9B53411822F/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">002914</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002564</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000A84</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Freezing of Gait Questionnaire: validity and reliability of the Swedish version</title><author><name sortKey="Nilsson, M H" sort="Nilsson, M H" uniqKey="Nilsson M" first="M. H." last="Nilsson">M. H. Nilsson</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Lund</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Lund</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Lund</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hagell, P" sort="Hagell, P" uniqKey="Hagell P" first="P." last="Hagell">P. Hagell</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Lund</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Lund</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Lund</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Acta Neurologica Scandinavica</title><idno type="ISSN">0001-6314</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0404</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-11">2009-11</date><biblScope unit="volume">120</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="331">331</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="334">334</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0001-6314</idno></series><idno type="istex">7228BDDB6D2D35017F1436A55E56C9B53411822F</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0404.2009.01175.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ANE1175</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0001-6314</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Parkinson’s disease</term><term>assessment</term><term>freezing of gait</term><term>reliability</term><term>validity</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background – Patient‐reported assessments of freezing of gait (FOG) in Parkinson’s disease (PD), such as the FOG questionnaire (FOGQ), are needed because FOG is difficult to assess objectively. However, the measurement properties of the FOGQ have been sparsely assessed. Aim – To assess the measurement properties of the Swedish FOGQ, and to explore relationships between FOGQ scores and other aspects of PD. Methods – Thirty‐seven people with PD were assessed with the FOGQ, Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS), Hoehn and Yahr (HY), Falls‐Efficacy Scale [FES(S)], timed gait tests, and the SF‐36 physical functioning (PF) scale. Results – Mean (SD) FOGQ item scores ranged between 1.3 and 2.1 (1.2–1.5); corrected item–total correlations ranged between 0.80 and 0.94. Reliability was 0.95. Mean (SD) and median (q1–q3) FOGQ scores were 9.6 (7.4) and 10 (2–15). Floor and ceiling effects were ≤5.4%. FOGQ correlated strongest with UPDRS part II (ADL), UPDRS item 14 (freezing), and HY (rS 0.65–0.66). FOGQ scores correlated with PD duration, the Timed Up and Go test, dyskinesia, motor fluctuations, FES(S), and PF scores (rS 0.40–0.62). Fallers had higher FOGQ scores than non‐fallers (median 12.5 vs 5.0). Conclusion – Data support the measurement properties of the Swedish FOGQ by replicating and extending previous psychometric reports.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Suède</li></country></list><tree><country name="Suède"><noRegion><name sortKey="Nilsson, M H" sort="Nilsson, M H" uniqKey="Nilsson M" first="M. H." last="Nilsson">M. H. Nilsson</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Hagell, P" sort="Hagell, P" uniqKey="Hagell P" first="P." last="Hagell">P. Hagell</name><name sortKey="Hagell, P" sort="Hagell, P" uniqKey="Hagell P" first="P." last="Hagell">P. Hagell</name><name sortKey="Nilsson, M H" sort="Nilsson, M H" uniqKey="Nilsson M" first="M. H." last="Nilsson">M. H. Nilsson</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/ParkinsonV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A84 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000A84 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= ParkinsonV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:7228BDDB6D2D35017F1436A55E56C9B53411822F
|texte= Freezing of Gait Questionnaire: validity and reliability of the Swedish version
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |